Seth Rich

[BigDroppa]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08...-campaign/

Small win for Blutarsky to pursue libel case and keep this case bubbling up. 

When will Durban and Barr look into this ?

[lrrps21]

An old dude once told me "Politicians and Journalists run the word - neither possess skills"

[ScarletHayes]

I'm a little lost.  He's suing NPR because they claimed that his claims were baseless?  The basic point seemed to be spread out all through the story without really connecting any dots in a coherent manner.  Then again, that's the whole Russian hoax in a nutshell.  This ***** (the whole enchilada) needs bullet pointed.   I just don't get how NPR possibly being wrong amounts to libel...???

Lastly, from my POV, Rich's family *appears* to have been gotten to early in the process.  They seemed hell bent in nixing any talk that he could have been murdered for reasons other than the botched robbery attempt.  The way they came out so quickly and forcefully just never really added up to me

[BoyGenius]

What's up with the brother in the interview?

And as someone pointed out in the comments, at 40 seconds as the mother starts speaking and the camera pans to her, the father appears to be mouthing the her lines.

[ScarletHayes]

He did.  That definitely looked weird.  

What's also odd is how emphatically they state that nothing was taken from him, and yet they stick to the position that it was a botched robbery.  How do you know it was a botched robbery?  What would be the signs when nothing was missing?  

To me, a shot in the back signifies a guy trying to run away.  If I'm trying to rob someone am I gonna gun him down (make all that noise and commotion) and then stand over him trying to steal off his body?  His parents mentioned that he was talking to police/paramedics on the scene.  Ok, so if you were the thief that already shot him, why wouldn't you just finish him off and then rob him?  You already put a round or two in him.  This is just off on multiple levels.  Common sense says he was simply gunned down.   


I forget already (posting on phone, not going back) did the parents say that Seth told cops he struggled with someone?  Again though, if a robbery and you already put a round or two in him...  why wouldn't you finish him so he couldn't fight you off?  

[zigbee]

Very odd indeed.

[K9Buck]

I've never seen parents so disinterested in pursuing their child's killer. It's almost as if someone got to the parents and explained to them that it's better for them, as well as their surviving son. to just accept the "botched robbery" narrative and let it go.

[ScarletHayes]

I've never seen parents so disinterested in pursuing their child's killer.  It's almost as if someone got to the parents and explained to them that it's better for them, as well as their surviving son. to just accept the "botched robbery" narrative and let it go.

It's hard to judge people in these situations, but mothers especially are typically complete basket cases (understandably so).  She seemed very composed. I don't know.  Impossible to know what's going through a person's head, still though...  they seemed strangley married to that botched robbery narrative  awfully early on in the process.

[3rdgensooner]

The guy was shot in the back in DC and left alive. About the opposite of an assassination attempt. Plus there doesnâ€t seem to be any reason to assassinate him. The Wikileaks stuff looks like Alex Jones level BS. Iâ€m sure the parents want the police to catch the killers and are irritated by the nuts.

[ScarletHayes]

The guy was shot in the back in DC and left alive. About the opposite of an assassination attempt. Plus there doesnâ€t seem to be any reason to assassinate him. The Wikileaks stuff looks like Alex Jones level BS. Iâ€m sure the parents want the police to catch the killers and are irritated by the nuts.

Well, it was in fact the middle of the night.  Precision may have not been an option.  

A robbery attempt here just doesn't really seem to add up to me.

Edit:  The wiki leaks stuff seems to be the most believable scenario.  Remember it's been shown to have been an inside job, not a hacking.  If this kid was the compromise and it was in fact simply a botched robbery attempt, that is some crazy azz coincidence.

[3rdgensooner]

The guy was shot in the back in DC and left alive. About the opposite of an assassination attempt. Plus there doesnâ€t seem to be any reason to assassinate him. The Wikileaks stuff looks like Alex Jones level BS. Iâ€m sure the parents want the police to catch the killers and are irritated by the nuts.

Well, it was in fact the middle of the night.  Precision may have not been an option.  

A robbery attempt here just doesn't really seem to add up to me.

Edit:  The wiki leaks stuff seems to be the most believable scenario.  Remember it's been shown to have been an inside job, not a hacking.  If this kid was the compromise and it was in fact simply a botched robbery attempt, that is some crazy azz coincidence.

It doesnâ€t appear to be an inside job. Wikileaks got the info from Guccifer. What kind of assassins shoot someone in the back and leave him alive? It sounds like a botched robbery and unlike any assassination Iâ€ve ever heard of. Precision ? WTF? Alex Jones stuff. Conspiracy crap just makes conservatives look like nuts.

[ScarletHayes]

The guy was shot in the back in DC and left alive. About the opposite of an assassination attempt. Plus there doesnâ€t seem to be any reason to assassinate him. The Wikileaks stuff looks like Alex Jones level BS. Iâ€m sure the parents want the police to catch the killers and are irritated by the nuts.

Well, it was in fact the middle of the night.  Precision may have not been an option.  

A robbery attempt here just doesn't really seem to add up to me.

Edit:  The wiki leaks stuff seems to be the most believable scenario.  Remember it's been shown to have been an inside job, not a hacking.  If this kid was the compromise and it was in fact simply a botched robbery attempt, that is some crazy azz coincidence.

It doesnâ€t appear to be an inside job. Wikileaks got the info from Guccifer. What kind of assassins shoot someone in the back and leave him alive? It sounds like a botched robbery and unlike any assassination Iâ€ve ever heard of. Precision ? WTF? Alex Jones stuff. Conspiracy crap just makes conservatives look like nuts.

I thought the download speed signified a, for lack of a better word, thumb drive of some sort.  I thought that was already well established information.  That would mean someone with access to the servers.  

As for a botched robbery, who fires at a person that's running away when they (the shooter/thief) don't want to draw any attention?   If there was a struggle and then Seth took off, again you shoot him in the back (draw attention)?  Makes no sense at all.  Then of course nothing was missing.  A shooting here in a robbery scenario makes no sense at all.  

Kid worked for the DNC.  The data off the dnc servers was an inside job.  The kid gets whacked and you're playing the Alex Jones card?  Come on, man.  It's not that preposterous.

[3rdgensooner]

Donâ€t know what youâ€re talking about looks like an unprofessional shooting not the work of assassins. Also all the inside stuff is speculation by oddballs not established by any means.

[computerbuck]

Rubio Bush and Mccain involved what an interview

[ScarletHayes]

Donâ€t know what youâ€re talking about looks like an unprofessional shooting not the work of assassins. Also all the inside stuff is speculation by oddballs not established by any means.

All ya need is some meat ball from the street to do the hit.  If anything that adds another layer of plausible deniability.  Not to mention that in the final analysis the potential hit was successful.  

As for the download/hack, we know that the dnc told the fbi to go pound sand.  They had CrowdStrike do the "investigation" instead.  If the FBI ever visits your office to seize your computers just tell them to get lost.  You have Scarlet Hayes and Maize coming in to investigate.  Let me know how that turns out.     As for the download speed I wish I could keep this crap straight, but I thought that was established fact. I recall a former intel guy, Binney, discussing it a while back.  Maybe someone else can verify.

To be clear, I'm not claiming certainty here.  Just saying that 9 outta 10 times if it walks like a duck...