THE LEFT'S CHILDISH IDEOLOGY of HYPOCRISY, LIES, TANTRUMS, VITTLES AND MORE...

[somenole]

I don't follow AOC close enough to know that she responded to Liz Chaney......and don't know what Liz said to create a response.

Fill me in....

Lord, almighty.  What am I, your secretary?  Liz Cheney brought up the WW2 Holocaust. 
I don't follow her at all. But I am vaguely aware that she exists and that republicans have a fixation on her. Even a cursory glance at the headlines/topics of MSN, Yahoo, Reddit and the ZZLp tells you that.

You should read what your political opponents are saying, not what your political party tells you they are saying.

[Alabuckeye]

I don't follow AOC close enough to know that she responded to Liz Chaney......and don't know what Liz said to create a response.

Fill me in....

Lord, almighty.  What am I, your secretary?  Liz Cheney brought up the WW2 Holocaust. 
I don't follow her at all. But I am vaguely aware that she exists and that republicans have a fixation on her. Even a cursory glance at the headlines/topics of MSN, Yahoo, Reddit and the ZZLp tells you that.

You should read what your political opponents are saying, not what your political party tells you they are saying.

having been on boards for 18 years, I've noticed that it's not uncommon that when people make assertions, they are asked to back them up.  I've been asked, so I didn't think it would be an affront to you to back up what you said.
I'm aware that Republicans have a fixation on her and it's because of what ideas she puts forward......ideas that even her own party backs way away from.  I'm sure though that Republicans do take her out of context.  None of that has anything to do with the multiple assertions you've made that you've not backed up to this point.

Again, is it so hard to find a liberal that will back up what they say?  Good heavens.  It's like pulling hens teeth.

[Alabuckeye]

It might be fund raising.

I would posit that fund raising ability comes from the chutzpah....

[cincydawg]

I'm careful to look past a paraphrasing. Often we hear that X said Y, and it turns out the direct quote in context is rather different, like the claim that Biden compared Trump's election to the assassination of RFK and MLK.

[Alabuckeye]

it's important to have proper context on what people say. I agree with that. I don't think that AOC's main issue is that she is continually being taken out of context though....

[somenole]

I don't follow AOC close enough to know that she responded to Liz Chaney......and don't know what Liz said to create a response.

Fill me in....

Lord, almighty.  What am I, your secretary?  Liz Cheney brought up the WW2 Holocaust. 
I don't follow her at all. But I am vaguely aware that she exists and that republicans have a fixation on her. Even a cursory glance at the headlines/topics of MSN, Yahoo, Reddit and the ZZLp tells you that.

You should read what your political opponents are saying, not what your political party tells you they are saying.

having been on boards for 18 years, I've noticed that it's not uncommon that when people make assertions, they are asked to back them up.  I've been asked, so I didn't think it would be an affront to you to back up what you said.
I'm aware that Republicans have a fixation on her and it's because of what ideas she puts forward......ideas that even her own party backs way away from.  I'm sure though that Republicans do take her out of context.  None of that has anything to do with the multiple assertions you've made that you've not backed up to this point.

Again, is it so hard to find a liberal that will back up what they say?  Good heavens.  It's like pulling hens teeth.

What?  Iâ€ve asserted nothing of the sort, esp not multiple assertions,  You asked for 1 example. I gave it to you. You want me to google the AOC L Cheney exchange, copy and pasta it for you and regurgitate it? I tried to lead you to her twitter feed by reference. It has her history of word salad with republicans; Steve King, Kevin McCarthy, Liz Cheney show up in the front page. You never struck me as lazy before.

[somenole]

it's important to have proper context on what people say.  I agree with that.  I don't think that AOC's main issue is that she is continually being taken out of context though....

No, her main issue is sheâ€s a socialist. Whatever that means, in her mind.

[Alabuckeye]

I don't follow AOC close enough to know that she responded to Liz Chaney......and don't know what Liz said to create a response.

Fill me in....

Lord, almighty.  What am I, your secretary?  Liz Cheney brought up the WW2 Holocaust. 
I don't follow her at all. But I am vaguely aware that she exists and that republicans have a fixation on her. Even a cursory glance at the headlines/topics of MSN, Yahoo, Reddit and the ZZLp tells you that.

You should read what your political opponents are saying, not what your political party tells you they are saying.

having been on boards for 18 years, I've noticed that it's not uncommon that when people make assertions, they are asked to back them up.  I've been asked, so I didn't think it would be an affront to you to back up what you said.
I'm aware that Republicans have a fixation on her and it's because of what ideas she puts forward......ideas that even her own party backs way away from.  I'm sure though that Republicans do take her out of context.  None of that has anything to do with the multiple assertions you've made that you've not backed up to this point.

Again, is it so hard to find a liberal that will back up what they say?  Good heavens.  It's like pulling hens teeth.

What?  Iâ€ve asserted nothing of the sort, esp not multiple assertions,  You asked for 1 example. I gave it to you. You want me to google the AOC L Cheney exchange, copy and pasta it for you and regurgitate it? I tried to lead you to her twitter feed by reference. It has her history of word salad with republicans; Steve King, Kevin McCarthy, Liz Cheney show up in the front page. You never struck me as lazy before.

you asserted that AOC makes examples of Republican's idiotic statements.  I asked for an example.  You allude to one, but typically in a discussion, details are given.  Not "Go look up proof of what I'm saying".
I get that it must be tiring and discouraging to have AOC and others be the face of your party.  You aren't an idiot, and you are tied at the hip with a bunch of them.  
To top it off, you have Willie Taggart as a HC.....
I get why you are testy.  Just don't take it out on me.  I'm your friend.

[BoyGenius]

That isn't the level of interest in AOC you represented...

That was a simple twitter search. Front page level of reading. I had ten seconds to spare.

Yes, but you claimed she "poked at idiotic things that elected pubs say and do."

[cincydawg]

I'm willing to stipulate that AOC makes fun of stuff Republicans said. I don't have any examples in mind, but she probably has done that, maybe. Republicans return the favor. On net, they seem to have more ammo.

[somenole]

I don't follow AOC close enough to know that she responded to Liz Chaney......and don't know what Liz said to create a response.

Fill me in....

Lord, almighty.  What am I, your secretary?  Liz Cheney brought up the WW2 Holocaust. 
I don't follow her at all. But I am vaguely aware that she exists and that republicans have a fixation on her. Even a cursory glance at the headlines/topics of MSN, Yahoo, Reddit and the ZZLp tells you that.

You should read what your political opponents are saying, not what your political party tells you they are saying.

having been on boards for 18 years, I've noticed that it's not uncommon that when people make assertions, they are asked to back them up.  I've been asked, so I didn't think it would be an affront to you to back up what you said.
I'm aware that Republicans have a fixation on her and it's because of what ideas she puts forward......ideas that even her own party backs way away from.  I'm sure though that Republicans do take her out of context.  None of that has anything to do with the multiple assertions you've made that you've not backed up to this point.

Again, is it so hard to find a liberal that will back up what they say?  Good heavens.  It's like pulling hens teeth.

What?  Iâ€ve asserted nothing of the sort, esp not multiple assertions,  You asked for 1 example. I gave it to you. You want me to google the AOC L Cheney exchange, copy and pasta it for you and regurgitate it? I tried to lead you to her twitter feed by reference. It has her history of word salad with republicans; Steve King, Kevin McCarthy, Liz Cheney show up in the front page. You never struck me as lazy before.

you asserted that AOC makes examples of Republican's idiotic statements.  I asked for an example.  You allude to one, but typically in a discussion, details are given.  Not "Go look up proof of what I'm saying".
I get that it must be tiring and discouraging to have AOC and others be the face of your party.  You aren't an idiot, and you are tied at the hip with a bunch of them.  
To top it off, you have Willie Taggart as a HC.....
I get why you are testy.  Just don't take it out on me.  I'm your friend.

Read the anti Jimbo Fisher story thatâ€s out there now. 
Lets do this.

[lrrps21]

"We were the team that had caught Alabama and was getting ready to pass them.

Somebody should ask AD Dave Coburn what the color of the sky is in his world because FSU wasn't getting anything but its butt kicked by Alabama.

Alabama  24
Florida St 7

[somenole]

"We were the team that had caught Alabama and was getting ready to pass them.

Somebody should ask AD Dave Coburn what the color of the sky is in his world because FSU wasn't getting anything but its butt kicked by Alabama.

Alabama  24
Florida St 7

It was close until the 2nd half. But I don't think that what he was talking about. He thinks that it could have been FSU and not Clemson that won 2 of the last 5 championships. I don't agree but that's where he was coming from.

[somenole]

I don't follow AOC close enough to know that she responded to Liz Chaney......and don't know what Liz said to create a response.

Fill me in....

Lord, almighty.  What am I, your secretary?  Liz Cheney brought up the WW2 Holocaust. 
I don't follow her at all. But I am vaguely aware that she exists and that republicans have a fixation on her. Even a cursory glance at the headlines/topics of MSN, Yahoo, Reddit and the ZZLp tells you that.

You should read what your political opponents are saying, not what your political party tells you they are saying.

having been on boards for 18 years, I've noticed that it's not uncommon that when people make assertions, they are asked to back them up.  I've been asked, so I didn't think it would be an affront to you to back up what you said.
I'm aware that Republicans have a fixation on her and it's because of what ideas she puts forward......ideas that even her own party backs way away from.  I'm sure though that Republicans do take her out of context.  None of that has anything to do with the multiple assertions you've made that you've not backed up to this point.

Again, is it so hard to find a liberal that will back up what they say?  Good heavens.  It's like pulling hens teeth.

What?  Iâ€ve asserted nothing of the sort, esp not multiple assertions,  You asked for 1 example. I gave it to you. You want me to google the AOC L Cheney exchange, copy and pasta it for you and regurgitate it? I tried to lead you to her twitter feed by reference. It has her history of word salad with republicans; Steve King, Kevin McCarthy, Liz Cheney show up in the front page. You never struck me as lazy before.

you asserted that AOC makes examples of Republican's idiotic statements.  I asked for an example.  You allude to one, but typically in a discussion, details are given.  Not "Go look up proof of what I'm saying".
I get that it must be tiring and discouraging to have AOC and others be the face of your party.  You aren't an idiot, and you are tied at the hip with a bunch of them.  
To top it off, you have Willie Taggart as a HC.....
I get why you are testy.  Just don't take it out on me.  I'm your friend.

https://twitter.com/Ocasio2018/status/10...28/photo/1

[lrrps21]

"We were the team that had caught Alabama and was getting ready to pass them.

Somebody should ask AD Dave Coburn what the color of the sky is in his world because FSU wasn't getting anything but its butt kicked by Alabama.

Alabama  24
Florida St 7

It was close until the 2nd half. But I don't think that what he was talking about. He thinks that it could have been FSU and not Clemson that won 2 of the last 5 championships. I don't agree but that's where he was coming from.

I know what he was talking about (Clemson). The problem was Fisher lost control somewhere and gave up the ghost for a lot more coin in College Station. 

FSU is one of my favorite teams to watch. In the 80's and 90's only FSU could match Miami talent wise.