P1tchblack's "All Things About Cops" Thread...

[zigbee]

Waiting for that detail.....

And you'll continue to wait unless you are on the jury and part of the court proceedings.  You presume all perpetrators innocent while at the same time all cops guilty.  You really don't know.

[dkeener67]

Waiting for that detail.....

Serious question - Have you undergone any therapy for this traumatic event that triggered this cop obsession that you have?  You seem like a smart enough guy and a decent enough dude with the exception of this obsession that you have all because you were in a car that got pulled over for a bogus reason but without any arrests or other consequences.

[P1tchblack]

Waiting for that detail.....

And you'll continue to wait unless you are on the jury and part of the court proceedings.  You presume all perpetrators innocent while at the same time all cops guilty.  You really don't know.

I'm not presuming the cop is guilty.  He was found innocent.

[zigbee]

Waiting for that detail.....

And you'll continue to wait unless you are on the jury and part of the court proceedings.  You presume all perpetrators innocent while at the same time all cops guilty.  You really don't know.

I'm not presuming the cop is guilty.  He was found innocent.

You cried all thread about shooting an unarmed kid running in the back.  Which is it?

[va1bucksfan1]

Serious question - Have you undergone any therapy for this traumatic event that triggered this cop obsession that you have?  

#SeverelyMentallyDamaged

[P1tchblack]

Waiting for that detail.....

And you'll continue to wait unless you are on the jury and part of the court proceedings.  You presume all perpetrators innocent while at the same time all cops guilty.  You really don't know.

I'm not presuming the cop is guilty.  He was found innocent.

You cried all thread about shooting an unarmed kid running in the back.  Which is it?

The fact that he shot an unarmed kid in the back is 100% a fact.  It also has nothing to do with being found guilty or innocent.

[zigbee]

Waiting for that detail.....

And you'll continue to wait unless you are on the jury and part of the court proceedings.  You presume all perpetrators innocent while at the same time all cops guilty.  You really don't know.

I'm not presuming the cop is guilty.  He was found innocent.

You cried all thread about shooting an unarmed kid running in the back.  Which is it?

The fact that he shot an unarmed kid in the back is 100% a fact.  It also has nothing to do with being found guilty or innocent.

it has to do with the trial

[P1tchblack]

And you'll continue to wait unless you are on the jury and part of the court proceedings.  You presume all perpetrators innocent while at the same time all cops guilty.  You really don't know.

I'm not presuming the cop is guilty.  He was found innocent.

You cried all thread about shooting an unarmed kid running in the back.  Which is it?

The fact that he shot an unarmed kid in the back is 100% a fact.  It also has nothing to do with being found guilty or innocent.

it has to do with the trial

Of course, but, as I've already said, the laws that allow cops to shoot unarmed teens, who are threatening nobody IS one of the main issues.

I'm not shocked in the slightest that he was found not guilty.  I mean, he did say (summarizing) "I was scurred.....".  Whether or not the dead person actually threatened him, or was even armed, is irrelevant.

[zigbee]

I'm not presuming the cop is guilty.  He was found innocent.

You cried all thread about shooting an unarmed kid running in the back.  Which is it?

The fact that he shot an unarmed kid in the back is 100% a fact.  It also has nothing to do with being found guilty or innocent.

it has to do with the trial

Of course, but, as I've already said, the laws that allow cops to shoot unarmed teens, who are threatening nobody IS one of the main issues.

I'm not shocked in the slightest that he was found not guilty.  I mean, he did say (summarizing) "I was scurred.....".  Whether or not the dead person actually threatened him, or was even armed, is irrelevant.

You weren't on the jury and you don't have all the fact.  That is a fact.  Laws don't ALLOW what you maintain.   Laws don't allow anyone to kill another without cause.  There has to be cause.

[P1tchblack]

You cried all thread about shooting an unarmed kid running in the back.  Which is it?

The fact that he shot an unarmed kid in the back is 100% a fact.  It also has nothing to do with being found guilty or innocent.

it has to do with the trial

Of course, but, as I've already said, the laws that allow cops to shoot unarmed teens, who are threatening nobody IS one of the main issues.

I'm not shocked in the slightest that he was found not guilty.  I mean, he did say (summarizing) "I was scurred.....".  Whether or not the dead person actually threatened him, or was even armed, is irrelevant.

You weren't on the jury and you don't have all the fact.  That is a fact.  Laws don't ALLOW what you maintain.   Laws don't allow anyone to kill another without cause.  There has to be cause.

Correct.  There has to be cause and proving cause, for cops, is incredibly easy as has been shown repeatedly in the past.

[P1tchblack]

Workin' Hard in Missouri!

Police searched a cancer patientâ€s room for marijuana after someone called 911


When police officers wanted to search Nolan Sousleyâ€s medicine bag, he said no.

One of the officers said police had received a call that marijuana could be smelled in the hospital room in Bolivar, in western Missouri — where the substance is illegal, though medical marijuana will soon be available in the state. Sousley, who said he has Stage 4 pancreatic cancer, told the officers that he had taken THC oil pills in the parking lot of Citizens Memorial Hospital but that he did not have marijuana and he did not want them going through his things.

“There is no way they could smell it, doc, because I donâ€t smoke it,” Sousley said to a medical professional who was in the room Wednesday during a Facebook Live video. The video was streamed from the page “Nolanâ€s Tribe of Warriors Against Cancer.” “I donâ€t ever use a ground-up plant. Itâ€s an oil that I use in a capsule.”

Then he told her about his bag of medication.

“Iâ€m not letting them dig through it. It has my final-day things in there, and nobodyâ€s going to dig in it,” Sousley said, his voice cracking.
Sousley said in a subsequent video that he ultimately let one of the officers go through the bag and that no marijuana was discovered.

The video of the search, which has been viewed more than 600,000 times, prompted outcry from people advocating for such oils and for Sousley, who has said that he does not know how long he has to live. The Facebook page for Sousley said he was diagnosed around Memorial Day with pancreatic cancer that had metastasized to his liver. He said he takes THC oil to manage pain.
A Facebook post from Thursday talked about the viral response.


“This is what Iâ€ve worked for. It finally got here. Here we go fellow fighters. We goin viral. Iâ€m gettin calls from weed companies, attorneys I am crying Iâ€m so happy. I can quit workin so hard now,” it read.

The comment added, “I told you I was gonna do this and I did. I want the world to see how we treat our own people. Forget immigration we have criminals laying in the hospital I guess. I am so happy. Look what weâ€ve done. All of us together. Thank you all so much for caring and believing. Let it go. Let it grow.”

Amid the uproar, Sousley told the Bolivar Herald-Free Press that he did not blame the police and hopes the incident can be used for good.
Bolivar Police Chief Mark Webb told the Herald-Free Press that officers responded to a call last week about possible marijuana in a patientâ€s room at Citizens Memorial Hospital and obtained consent to conduct a search. It is not clear who placed the call. But Sousley told the newspaper that a security guard entered his room, saying he could smell marijuana smoke, then phoned police.


The Facebook Live video started after police arrived. In the video, an officer is seen searching bags in Sousleyâ€s room.

During the search, a woman in a white lab coat, whom Sousley referred to in the video as his doctor, asked the officers, “Just from a legal standpoint, do you have probable cause to search his stuff? Do you have the right to search his stuff or do you need a warrant for that?”

Officers told the doctor that they had the right because it was on private property.

“So whatâ€s the proceeding here?” she asked them. “Because he needs to be here.”

The officers explained that if they discovered marijuana, they would give Sousley a citation but would not take him to jail. Soon after, the broadcast ended.

Webb, the police chief, told the Herald-Free Press that “nothing was found.”

Police did not immediately respond to a request for comment by The Washington Post.

After the incident, Tamera Heitz-Peek, a hospital spokeswoman, said in a statement to The Post that “respect is part of our core values” and “our actions in this recent event did not reflect who we are as an organization.”

“We pride ourselves in providing compassionate care to all patients and we fell short of expectations,” she said in the statement Sunday. “We apologize to our patient and his family and friends who were affected by our actions. We are reviewing the incident and will retrain our employees in the core values and the importance of respect and dignity to our patients and the community.”

In November, Missourians voted to legalize medical marijuana for patients with serious illnesses or medical conditions. However, the rules and regulations needed to implement the law may not be in place until the summer, and the substance will not be available for purchase until at least January, according to the stateâ€s Department of Health and Senior Services. Patients with cancer, epilepsy, glaucoma, and chronic or terminal conditions may qualify for treatment.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/20...edirect=on&utm_term=.0be325f997d2

[Alabuckeye]

what did the police do wrong there?

[zigbee]

The fact that he shot an unarmed kid in the back is 100% a fact.  It also has nothing to do with being found guilty or innocent.

it has to do with the trial

Of course, but, as I've already said, the laws that allow cops to shoot unarmed teens, who are threatening nobody IS one of the main issues.

I'm not shocked in the slightest that he was found not guilty.  I mean, he did say (summarizing) "I was scurred.....".  Whether or not the dead person actually threatened him, or was even armed, is irrelevant.

You weren't on the jury and you don't have all the fact.  That is a fact.  Laws don't ALLOW what you maintain.   Laws don't allow anyone to kill another without cause.  There has to be cause.

Correct.  There has to be cause and proving cause, for cops, is incredibly easy as has been shown repeatedly in the past.

Incredibly easy is your opinion.   I would give you deference on this IF you were on the jury and witnessed evidence.  You haven't.

[P1tchblack]

it has to do with the trial

Of course, but, as I've already said, the laws that allow cops to shoot unarmed teens, who are threatening nobody IS one of the main issues.

I'm not shocked in the slightest that he was found not guilty.  I mean, he did say (summarizing) "I was scurred.....".  Whether or not the dead person actually threatened him, or was even armed, is irrelevant.

You weren't on the jury and you don't have all the fact.  That is a fact.  Laws don't ALLOW what you maintain.   Laws don't allow anyone to kill another without cause.  There has to be cause.

Correct.  There has to be cause and proving cause, for cops, is incredibly easy as has been shown repeatedly in the past.

Incredibly easy is your opinion.   I would give you deference on this IF you were on the jury and witnessed evidence.  You haven't.

No.  You, like HT and others, will go to any lengths to give cops the benefit of the doubt, hiding behind what's technically legal, but not right, to the point that a you're able to rationalizing shooting in the back and killing an unarmed teenager.  Keep hope alive.

[va1bucksfan1]

what did the police do wrong there?

 
Absolutely nothing.  Cop was just doing his job, and nothing happened.  But #SeriouslyMentallyDamaged azzhats like Pitch have a burning need to try to make something of it.